Wednesday 24 October 2018

Doctor Who: Rosa

Doctor: 'I did not warm to him.'

It was with some trepidation that I approached tonight's episode. With a few notable exceptions, historical episodes rarely portray their famous subjects favourably, and with Rosa Parks the focus, the likelihood of getting it wrong seemed all too probable. Putting the Doctor at the centre of a pivotal moment in the civil rights movement could've been disastrous. But was it?

Surprisingly, no. The stage was set for all manner of traditional Who shenanigans, yet the Doctor didn't influence Rosa's most profound thoughts, Rosa didn't knowingly meet an alien, or go for a trip in the TARDIS, or marry the Doctor. In truth, the writers showed considerable restraint, and the episode was all the better for it. Sure, it suffered from the usual Chibnallisms (more on those later), but at least they got the heart of the story right. They didn't sully it with weak jokes. They didn't take away Rosa's agency. They even managed to keep the alien element on the periphery as the all too human drama played out.

Which may sound like faint praise—congratulating them for taking real people seriously, and not fucking everything up with jokes—but it was important they got that part right. They also got the casting right: Vinette Robinson was an absolute triumph. Despite knowing her from The A Word, Sherlock, Black Mirror, and even Doctor Who (she played Abi Learner in the rather underwhelming '42'), I didn't recognise her at all. Which is testament to how convincing she was as Rosa. The way she looked, the way she spoke, the way she utterly inhabited the role, really was the highlight of the episode for me.

The ending was also a blinder. The effective use of silence as Rosa said no, followed by Andra Day's 'Rise Up' as she was taken away while the Doctor and Co. looked on helplessly, were both poignant and sympathetically executed. Even Graham's realisation that to preserve history they had to become part of it, was moving and well acted. His horror at being one of the pivotal three on the bus, after two lacklustre weeks of personal development, really made his character come alive for me. One of the joys of the historical episode is seeing modern day characters interact with famous faces as they engage in their most notable acts, and they mostly succeeded in getting that across.

Less successful was the plotting: which is sadly becoming a recurring theme. The episode was written by Malorie Blackman and Chris Chibnall, so it's hard to really say who wrote what. I'm tempted to say that Blackman wrote the bulk of the Rosa stuff, and Chibnall wrote the rest, but the reality is probably that Blackman wrote it all, and Chibnall heavily rewrote it. That said, a lot of the foundational plotting bore the unmistakable hallmarks of Chibnall's flimsy set-up. Who was the villain?: well, he was a racist from the future. How did the Doctor manage to bag Elias Griffin Jr. tickets to see Sinatra?: well, Elvis just so happened to give him the Doctor's mobile phone. No explanation of why or how, these things just needed to happen to move the story forward, so they did.

This sort of contrived hand-waving pisses me off no end. Yes, they gave reasons why things happened: but were those reason satisfying? Was Krasko an even vaguely interesting character? With some fleshing out, he perhaps could've been. Instead they chose to turn him into some toothpick-nibbling cliche, with little motivation beyond wanting to keep Ryan's 'kind' from getting ideas above their station. He was nothing more than an underdeveloped placeholder, created to derail Rosa's historic moment. As a sidenote: the funniest thing I read on Twitter after this episode aired was: 'I'm angry that the villain was so good looking.' So either only ugly people can be criminals, or the tweeter was conflicted about fancying a monster.

A lot has been said recently about the show returning to its roots and educating children through its jaunts through actual history. Which although a noble brief, comes at the risk of making the dialogue generic and exposition heavy. Despite everyone being inexplicably knowledgeable about Rosa's history, there was still a liberal amount of encyclopedia-laden dialogue thrown in to educate the viewer. At one point, Ryan even had to forget some of the stuff he knew—blaming the pesky 'bus thing' for his confusion—just so the rest of the cast could fill him (and by extension, us) in on the details. Which is a clumsy way of getting information across. Show don't tell! Sophisticated television has been doing it for decades.

I did like the way they handled dropping Yaz and Ryan into 1950s Alabama. Despite Ryan's initial instinct to be outraged, the fact that he (eventually) adapted to his situation and managed to act effectively despite his circumstances, spoke well of his character. I also enjoyed his intimate chinwag with Yaz. Whilst recognising how far modernity has come, there was also the acknowledgement that there's still a long way to go. Yes, the exchange was little preachy, but the issues arguably can't be raised enough. Whether they went far enough comparing then with now, highlighting the areas where the differences are perhaps less marked, is a question for another time. At least for young Doctor Who fans, the conversation is ongoing.

Other Thoughts:

—How did they know that James Blake would be stood at the side of the street?

—I saw a few people on Twitter claiming that Doctor Who is too lightweight a vehicle to address such complex subjects as racism, and whilst there may be some truth to that, it can certainly raise awareness, even if the heavy lifting is eventually done by more capable entities.

—They really need to stop telegraphing their solutions so obviously. Last week it was Chekhov's cigar, and tonight it was Chekhov's displacement device.

—Three episodes, three different style endings. Just pick something and stick with it.

—If Rosa hadn't refused to relinquish her seat on December 1st, 1955, would the civil rights movement have stalled completely? I suppose the implication is that the Montgomery Bus Incident was a fixed point in time, but it's hard to believe that had she done the same thing a day/week/month later, the result wouldn't have been the same.

Quotes:

Waitress: 'We don't serve Negroes.'
Ryan: 'Good, because I don't eat them.'

Graham: 'Pack it in. You ain't Bansky.'
Doctor: 'Or am I?'

Ryan: 'Excuse me, Doctor King. Yes, Rosa Parks? Whoa!!!'

26 comments:

sunbunny said...

Interesting historical tidbit most people ignore (or don't know): Rosa Parks was not the first black person to refuse to give up her seat. There were a handful of men and women before her. I don't know why Mrs. Parks was the one to tip the scale and set off the boycott but, to answer your question, I like to think we would have gotten to the right side of history eventually. But, hey, I'm an optimist.

Didn't love the "Ryan was an idiot in school so let's go over all the details of Rosa Parks" bit. Pretty sloppy. AND ALSO HOW DOES GRAHAM BEING A BUS DRIVER KEEP BEING RELEVANT? Was this episode why they made him a bus driver?

Chronotis said...

It feels like they should've made Rosa's stand a fixed point in time to make the story make sense (why make such an effort to preserve the timeline if somebody else could've achieved the same result the following week), yet they probably didn't dare state it outright for fear of belittling the efforts of other civil rights campaigners. Which in hindsight makes this story a poor choice for wrapping time travel story around. Enjoyed it tho.

Artie said...

The Rosa part of the story was excellent, not sure about the rest. It felt like a poorly thought out secondary tale to run against such a marvellous main story. I get why a lot of people liked this, and I understand why you did, but I really didn't care for it. The civil rights aspect of the story was beautifully told, but as a Doctor Who story I think it failed. As you said in an earlier review, Chibnall's stories this season aren't quite as bad as his earlier Who efforts, but in terms of complexity they're not much better. This is mediocre science fiction fare, from someone who barely seems to understand the genre or have any interest in it.

Anonymous said...

Ratings?

Paul Reed said...

@Anonymous 6.4 million overnight.

Chronotis said...

Sunbunny: If this episode was the reason they made him a bus driver, then it's one of the worst payoffs ever :)

Artie said...

I'm calling it now: Graham will crash a space bus into a black hole in the finale.

Chronotis said...

Only for Ryan to save him on his space bike :)

AndroidKat said...

I too would be interested to know who wrote what of this episode. Chibnall just isn't a good writer for Nu-Who. His work on other shows has been adequate, but he really brings nothing memorable to this show. So it's a real concern whether he's capable of dealing with the complex subjects this season's chosen to explore. I thought tonight's episode went well, but Malorie Blackman co-wrote it, so a degree of sensitivity is to be expected. How well Chibnall deals with Ryan's dyspraxia, the effects of bereavement and racism in general has yet to be seen.

What I did find interesting is that this wasn't one of those episodes that compares then with now: in the sense of then being bad and now being good. It instead showed a gradient of improvement, with work still to be done. The planet stuff at the end was obviously a bit schmaltzy, but that was more a tribute to the person of Rosa Parks, than the current political climate.

Since this season is intent upon teaching, maybe this is a good thing. I'm not sure how adept any of the Doctor Who writers are at forming 50 minute moral tales which not only entertain but are also thought provoking, but good on them for trying. Hopefully kids will take the obvious messages on board and do better than our generation did.

Paul Reed said...

AndroidKat: your last comment posted three times, so I deleted the earlier versions. Hope that's okay.

AndroidKat said...

Yes, sorry, my connection went kind of squiffy.

Nemi Perrioff said...

I don't understand why so many people are slagging off Chibnall's writing. Can you give an example of something that was bad?

Paul Reed said...

I did in my review, Nemi. The idea that the Doctor would give Elvis a mobile phone, and that Elvis would give that mobile phone to Sinatra, who just so happens to be Elias Griffin Jr's wife's favourite artist, is bad writing. It relies too much on random chance and coincidence, which just isn't satisfying.

Chronotis said...

@Nemi: Also the lack of care that went into the villain. He was just evil for evil's sake. No motive, no relatable personality traits, they even gave him a clichéd tick.

Drayton Turner said...

I don't know whether I'd characterise Chibnall's writing as weak, but it's a lot more simplistic than we're used to. When Moffat took over, I thought he made Davies look weak. Now that Chibnall's in charge, he makes Davies look like a genius.

Paul Reed said...

That's actually a good point, Drayton, I don't think that Davies lacked ideas... I'd even argue that he frequently had too many for a single episode and that nothing got the development it deserved, it's just his implementation that was weak. So far Chibnall's s story ideas have been ordinary. It's like he nicked them from Scifi for Dummies.

Anonymous said...

Sad to say it, but Doctor Who is now no longer on my must-watch list. I just got around to watching Rosa this morning and while it was an improvement on the episodes before it, it's still a pale imitation of the show's former self.

Sabatha said...

Here's a puzzler: which is better, the first three episodes of season ten, or the first three episodes of season eleven? No abstentions and no saying the dog ate your homework.

Chronotis said...

So you want us to compare the worst of the Moffat era with the best (so far) of the Chibnall era? I'm calling it even. Both were weak story-wise.

Anonymous said...

Season eleven, purely because season ten's Doctor seemed different to season nine's.

Mark Greig said...

Sabatha, I'd go with season 10. 'Smile' may be pants, but 'The Pilot' and 'Thin Ice' were both pretty good and more rewatchable than anything I've seen of the Chibnall era so far.

Paul Reed said...

It's hard to say: both blocks have problems, they're just of a different nature. I think I agree with Chronotis that it's about even, but season eleven has the added burden of having to introduce an entirely new cast, writers and team, so it doesn't feel fair to compare. For me the rewatchability of both seasons is low, however... unless something happens later in this season that gives the earlier episodes some hidden depth.

Tequatl said...

I think the first three episodes of season eleven have been more consistent in terms of quality, but the quality has been average overall. Season ten was all over the place quality wise for me.

Season eleven has also not turned out a classic episode yet. When it does, it'll be interesting to see how compares to what's gone before.

Huntress Angel said...

I honestly can't see why anyone would think that these first three episodes are worse than anything the Moffat era ever produced. They're just different. Each new showrunner brings their own style to the show in the same way that each new Doctor does. Jodie is the best Doctor since Matt Smith, I just wish people would give her a chance.

Paul Reed said...

Hi Huntress, I haven't really heard anyone criticising Jodie. Obviously there's still the odd knobhead insisting that the Doctor should be a man, but I haven't heard many criticise her acting, and I don't think I (or anyone else) did here. I'm also not sure that anyone said that the first three episodes of this season are worse than anything the Moffat era ever produced; I think Sabatha was just comparing like for like.

Kay said...

I'm not sure all the criticism has been from knobheads - I've heard a few people expressing genuine concerns about her dialogue and delivery.